kenosis
Print »     kenosis
Send »     kenosis
Add »   Search
Back  
Moble Dictionary of Theology « Mobile » kenosis

« Main

 kenosis
 
Flagellation. Artist: Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio. Date: c. 1607.
Flagellation. Artist: Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio. Date: c. 1607.
(larger image)

The Flagellation of Christ, Artist: Nicola Grassi, c. 1720, Oil on canvas, 105 x 159 cm, Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest
The Flagellation of Christ, Artist: Nicola Grassi, c. 1720, Oil on canvas, 105 x 159 cm, Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest
(larger image)
Kenosis is a Greek word for emptiness, which is used as a theological term. The ancient Greek word κένωσις kénōsis means an "emptying", from κενόςkenós "empty". The word is mainly used, however, in a Christian theological context, for example Philippians 2:5-8, using the verb form κενόω kenóō.
5 Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, 6 who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.
From Strong's G2758.:
  1. to empty, make empty
    • of Christ, he laid aside equality with or the form of God
  2. to make void
    • deprive of force, render vain, useless, of no effect
  3. to make void
    • cause a thing to be seen to be empty, hollow, false

Kenosis in Christology

In Christian theology, Kenosis is the concept of the 'self-emptying' of one's own will and becoming entirely receptive to God and His perfect will. It is used both as an explanation of the Incarnation, and an indication of the nature of God's activity and condescension. Mystical theologian John of the Cross' work Dark Night of the Soul is a particularly shining explanation of God's process of transforming the believer into the "likeness of Christ".
Jawaharlal Nehru sitting next to Gandhi at the AICC General Session, 1942.
Jawaharlal Nehru sitting next to Gandhi
at the AICC General Session, 1942.

(larger image)
An apparent dilemma arises when Christian theology posits a God outside of time and space, who enters into time and space to become human (personified). The doctrine of Kenosis attempts to explain what the Son of God chose to give up in terms of his divine attributes, in order to assume human nature. Since the incarnate Jesus is simultaneously fully human and fully divine, Kenosis holds that these changes were temporarily assumed by God in his incarnation, and that when Jesus ascended back into heaven following the resurrection, he fully reassumed all of his original attributes and divinity.

Specifically, it refers to those attributes of God that are thought to be incompatible with becoming fully human: God's omnipotence, omnipresence, omniscience as well as his aseity and eternity for example. Theologians who support this often appeal to a reading of Philippians 2:5-8. Critics of Kenosis theology argue that the context of Philippians 2:5-8 is referring to Jesus voluntarily taking the form of a servant to conceal his divine glory (revealed temporarily in the Transfiguration of Jesus), or to forsaking his place and position in heaven to dwell among men, as opposed to forsaking his divine attributes or nature (see syncatabasis).

Kenotic Christology focuses on certain passages in the Gospels where Jesus questions his being called "good:"

  • And Jesus said to him, "Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone. Mark 10:18
  • And Jesus said to him, "Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone. Luke 18:19
  • And he said to him, "Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments." Matthew 19:17
which some suggest would evidence that he was not omniscient concerning the date of the Second Advent. Others, however, would say that Jesus was really asking if they had any idea who he really is[6].

Why?

Jesus explains the general lack of comprehension regarding his teaching.

30"I can do nothing on my own. As I hear, I judge, and my judgment is just, because I seek not my own will but the will of him who sent me. 31If I alone bear witness about myself, my testimony is not deemed true. 32There is another who bears witness about me, and I know that the testimony that he bears about me is true. 33You sent to John, and he has borne witness to the truth. 34Not that the testimony that I receive is from man, but I say these things so that you may be saved. 35He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for a while in his light. 36But the testimony that I have is greater than that of John. For the works that the Father has given me to accomplish, the very works that I am doing, bear witness about me that the Father has sent me. 37And the Father who sent me has himself borne witness about me. His voice you have never heard, his form you have never seen, 38and you do not have his word abiding in you, for you do not believe the one whom he has sent. 39You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, 40yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life. 41I do not receive glory from people. 42But I know that you do not have the love of God within you. 43I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not receive me. If another comes in his own name, you will receive him. 44How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another and do not seek the glory that comes from the only God? 45Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father. There is one who accuses you: Moses, on whom you have set your hope. 46For if you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of me. 47But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?" John 5:30-47
Jesus returns to his declaration of the entire covenant between the Father and the Son, and professed himself the Son of God. His deposition was superior to that of John the Baptist. His acts authenticated all he had said. But, alas, The Word[6] had no abiding-place in their hearts, as they sat on the fence. They turned their back on Him, sent by the Father, according to his promises of old. The voice of God still proclaims that Jesus is the beloved Son, in whom the Father is well pleased. But when the hearts of men are full of pride, ambition, and the love of the the things of this world, there truly is no room for Jesus within their hearts. (Jn 5:39-44)

The Jews supposed that eternal life was divulged to them in their Scriptures, and that it was theirs', because they held the holy book in their possession. But, Jesus recommended that they search that book with more attentiveness and diligence. They Searched those Scriptures, but only to achieve their own glory. One can have an acute intellectual knowledge of the Scriptures and yet absorb little in the mind of the heart. He is also telling today's Christian community to search the Scriptures; that we must have more than intellectual knowledge in them... to search them, to study them. We must search the Scriptures for our eternal purpose. We must search them for Christ as the way to this purpose. His deposition includes reference to their lack of belief and the evil residing in them and their indifference of him and his teachings. Also he scolds them for their impoverishment of the love of God. The love of God that lives in us is that which God will accept. (Jn 5:45-47)

8Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love. 1 John 4:8

16So we have come to know and to believe the love that God has for us. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him. 1 John 4:16
  • "But concerning that day or that hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Mark 13:32
  • "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. Matthew 24:36

 

A homeless man in Paris
English: A homeless man in Paris.
Français: SDF (Sans domicile fixe) à Paris.

Own work by Eric Pouhier. Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 License.
(larger image)

It became a central issue in the Protestant debates of the sixteenth century, and was revived in the nineteenth century to reinterpret classical doctrines of the incarnation.
"Of all the things I have read what remained with me forever was that Jesus came almost to give a new law - not an eye for an eye but to receive two blows when only one was given, and to go two miles when they were asked to go one. I came to see that the Sermon on the Mount was the whole of Christianity for him who wanted to live a Christian life. It is that sermon that has endeared Jesus to me."
-Mahatma Gandhi
The Sermon on the Mount comprises the following components:
  • Introductory narrative (Matthew 5:1-2) - a large crowd assembles due to Jesus healing the sick, so he climbs a mountain and speaks;
  • The Beatitudes (Matthew 5:3-12);
  • The metaphors of Salt and Light (Matthew 5:13-16), which forms an introduction to the following section;
  • The Expounding of the Law (Matthew 5:17-48), a deconstruction and reinterpretation of Mosaic Law and in particular the Ten Commandments;
  • The Discourse on ostentation (Matthew 6), condemning fasting, alms, and prayer, when they are only done for show, and not from the heart. The discourse goes on to condemn the superficiality of materialism;
  • Within the discourse is the Lord's Prayer, which Matthew presents as an example of correct prayer, but Luke places in a different context;
  • The Discourse on judgementalism (Matthew 7:1-6), condemning those who judge others before first judging themselves;
  • The Discourse on holiness (Matthew 7:7-29), which forms the summary conclusion of the sermon, warning against False prophets, and giving emphasis to the difficulty of doing what is right.

Eastern Orthodox Mysticism

The Orthodox Mystical Theology of the East emphasises following the example of Christ. Kenosis is only possible through humility and presupposes that one seeks union with God. The Poustinia tradition of the Russian Orthodox Church is one major expression of this search.

Kenosis is not only a Christological issue in Orthodox theology, it has moreover to do with Pneumatology, namely to do with the Holy Spirit. Kenosis, relative to the human nature, denotes the continual epiklesis and self-denial of one's own human will and desire. With regards to Christ, there is a kenosis of the Son of God, a condescension and self sacrifice for the redemption and salvation of all humanity. Humanity can also participate in God's saving work through theosis; becoming holy by grace.[1]

Therefore, in Eastern Orthodoxy, theosis never concerns becoming like God in nature or essence, which is pantheism; instead, it concerns becoming united to God by grace, through his Energies. Since God in the Eastern traditions is somewhat panenthestic, Orthodox theology distinguishes between divine Essence and Energies. Kenosis therefore is a paradox and a mystery since "emptying oneself" in fact fills the person with divine grace and results in union with God. Kenosis in Orthodox theology is the transcending or detaching of oneself from the world or the passions, it is a component of dispassionation. Much of the earliest debates between the Arian and Orthodox Christians were over kenosis. The need for clarification about the human and divine nature of the Christ (see the hypostatic union) where fought over the meaning and example that Christ set the example of kenosis or ekkenosis.[2]

Protestantism

Another perspective is the idea that God is self-emptying. He poured out himself to create the cosmos and the universe, and everything within it. Therefore, it is our duty to pour out ourselves. (This is similar to C.S. Lewis's statement in Mere Christianity that a painter pours his ideas out in his work, and yet remains quite a distinct being from his painting.) In so doing, we become deified like God. Another term for this process is theosis.

Catholicism

Although catholicism accepts it , Pope Pius XII in 1951 wrote Sempiternus Rex Christus, in which he condemns a particular interpretation of Philippians in regards to the kenosis:
There is another enemy of the faith of Chalcedon, widely diffused outside the fold of the Catholic religion. This is an opinion for which a rashly and falsely understood sentence of St. Paul's Epistle to the Philippians (ii, 7), supplies a basis and a shape. This is called the kenotic doctrine, and according to it, they imagine that the divinity was taken away from the Word in Christ. It is a wicked invention, equally to be condemned with the Docetism opposed to it. It reduces the whole mystery of the Incarnation and Redemption to empty the bloodless imaginations. 'With the entire and perfect nature of man'--thus grandly St. Leo the Great--'He Who was true God was born, complete in his own nature, complete in ours' (Ep. xxviii, 3. PL. Liv, 763. Cf. Serm. xxiii, 2. PL. lvi, 201). [3]

Gnosticism

The equivalent to kenōsis in Gnostic literature is Christ's withdrawal of his own luminosity into himself, so as to cease dazzling his own disciples. At the request of his disciples, "Jesus drew to himself the glory of his light".[4] There are parallels to this voluntary withdrawal of the incarnate deity's light in the literatures of other religions also, such as in Daoism, where when the incarnate deity "Crane Boy" came to the world of humans in his incarnation as Han Xiangzi, he "concealed his auspicious light, left the underworld, and returned to the world of humans."[5]

The kenotic ethic

The kenotic ethic is the ethic of Jesus, considered as the ethic of the sacrifice of self. The Phillipians passage urges believers to imitate Christ's selfless asceticism. In this interpretation, Paul the Apostle was not primarily putting forth a theory about God in this passage, rather he was using God's humility exhibited in the incarnation event as a summons for Christians to be similarly acquiescent to each other, like the lamb of God.

See also

  • Christlike
    • We see Christ as one who not only carried out the will of God, but one who sought God's Will during times of solitude in prayer. Jesus sacrificed Himself to carry out the will of God. He could have stopped it at any time, but He allowed it to happen because it was God's Will and because He loves us that much.
      39 And going a little farther he fell on his face and prayed, saying, "My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as you will." (Matthew 26:39 ESV)

References

  • "The oneness of Essence, the Equality of Divinity, and the Equality of Honor of God the Son with the God the Father." Orthodox Dogmatic Theology: A Concise Exposition Protopresbyter Michael Pomazansky pages 92-95
  • "The oneness of Essence, the Equality of Divinity, and the Equality of Honor of God the Son with the God the Father." Orthodox Dogmatic Theology: A Concise Exposition Protopresbyter Michael Pomazansky pages 92-95

Biblical Cross-References

Site this page:

Timothy Ministries Dictionary of Theology. http://timothyministries.org 2005-2010.
"Kenosis"  < http://timothyministries.org/theologicaldictionary/references.aspx?theword=kenosis >   Retrieved: Sep 4 2010 8:04AM
#twurch

 

related to your query 
agapego »
Olivet discoursego »
The Letters of Paulgo »
The Four Lovesgo »
Thomas Jay Oordgo »
12
Translate a word/phrase

Translate kenosis to:
  • العربية/Arabic 
        kenosis

  • עברית/Hebrew 
        kenosis

  • فارسی/Persian 
        kenosis

  • Ελληνικά/Greek 
        kenosis

  • Afrikaans 
        kenosis

  • हिन्दी/Hindi 
        kenosis

  • 日本語/Japanese 
        kenosis

  • 简体中文/Chinese 
        kenosis

  • Türk/Turkish 
        kenosis

  • Русский/Russian 
        kenosis

  • Polski/Polish 
        kenosis
Other Items
Torrey's kenosis
Nave's kenosis
Easton's kenosis
Eurekster kenosis
Add td Search
to your Site.


 


Short Description
Kenosis is a Greek word for emptiness, which is used as a theological term meaning "emptying" ... more
Some of the information in this database has been extracted in whole or in part with and without modifications from http://en.wikipedia.org in accordance with their copyleft policy, also known as "Share-alike".

Some of these terms may have been extracted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ » kenosis under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts.

A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
Readers, a word of caution about Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia articles are edited by volunteers. The only necessary qualifications to become a Wikipedia editor are:
  • willingness to contribute and
  • Internet access
and therefore, some Wikipedia articles may not be reliable since an editor could literally be anyone.

For further information about the reliability of Wikipedia articles, see the article: Reliability of Wikipedia

2005-2010 TimothyMinistries.org
Timothy Ministries is an IRS approved non-profit 501(c)(3) organization.
#twurch