stephen c. meyer
Print »     stephen c. meyer
Send »     stephen c. meyer
Add »   Search
Back  
Moble Dictionary of Theology « Mobile » stephen c. meyer

« Main

 Stephen C. Meyer
 
Stephen C. Meyer is an American philosopher of science and theologian. Meyer, along with Bruce Chapman and George Gilder, is a founder of the Discovery Institute and its Center for Science and Culture, which advocates the controversial concept of intelligent design, and a leading proponent and lobbyist in the intelligent design movement. Meyer is a Vice President and Senior Fellow at the institute's Center for Science and Culture.

Biography

Stephen C. Meyer is director and Senior Fellow of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute, in Seattle.

Meyer graduated with a degree in geology in 1980 from Whitworth College and worked in the oil industry. After attending a creationist conference he became increasingly interested in origins and rejected the evolutionary creationism in which he had previously believed.

Stephen C. Meyer
Stephen C. Meyer
Meyer won a scholarship to Cambridge University in the United Kingdom to study the history and philosophy of science. Meyer earned his Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from Cambridge University in 1991. His dissertation was entitled
Of clues and causes : a methodological interpretation of origin of life studies

Meyer formerly worked as a geophysicist for the Atlantic Richfield Company and is now a Professor of the Conceptual Foundations of Science at Palm Beach Atlantic University, a Christian University, where he teaches a course on Christian apologetics in its School of Ministry. He was previously on the faculty of Whitworth College (which has links to the Presbyterian Church (USA) in Spokane, Washington for twelve years.

Meyer earned his Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from Cambridge University for a dissertation on the history of origin of life biology and the methodology of the historical sciences. Previously he worked as a geophysicist with the Atlantic Richfield Company after earning his undergraduate degrees in Physics and Geology.

Dr. Meyer has recently co-written or edited two books: Darwinism, Design, and Public Education with Michigan State University Press and Science and Evidence of Design in the Universe (Ignatius 2000).

He has also authored numerous technical articles as well as editorials in magazines and newspapers such as The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, The Houston Chronicle, The Chicago Tribune, First Things and National Review.

In 1990, Meyer, Bruce Chapman and George Gilder, formed the Discovery Institute as a non-profit educational foundation and think tank based upon the Christian apologetics of C. S. Lewis and opposed to materialism. It was founded as a branch of the Hudson Institute, an Indianapolis-based, conservative think tank and named for the HMS Discovery, which explored Puget Sound in 1792.

In 1993, Chapman secured seed money in the form of a grant from Howard Ahmanson, Jr. and $450,000 from the MacLellan Foundation which underwrote the earliest nucleus of intelligent design authors who titled themselves "The Wedge". Meyer had previously tutored Ahmanson's son in science and Meyer recalls being asked by Ahmanson "What could you do if you had some financial backing?" It is from these beginnings that the intelligent design movement grew.

Meyer has recently co-written or edited two books: Darwinism, Design, and Public Education with Michigan State University Press and Science and Evidence of Design in the Universe (Ignatius 2000). He has published over 70 articles and papers.

Meyer has been described as "the person who brought ID (intelligent design) to DI (Discovery Institute)" by historian Edward Larson, who was a fellow at the Discovery Institute prior to it becoming the center of the intelligent design movement.

Peer review controversy

On 4 August 2004, an article by Meyer appeared in the peer-reviewed scientific journal, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. On 7 September, the publisher of the journal, the Council of the Biological Society of Washington, released a statement repudiating the article as not meeting its scientific standards and not peer reviewed. The same statement vowed that proper review procedures would be followed in the future and endorsed a resolution published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which observes that there is no credible scientific evidence supporting ID. The journal's reasons for disavowing the article were denied by Richard Sternberg, the managing editor at the time the article was submitted and who subsequently left after its publication. Critics of Meyer's paper believe that Sternberg himself was biased in the matter, since he is a member of the editorial board of the Baraminology Study Group, an organization with a creationist agenda. The Baraminology Study Group's official position is that Sternberg is not a creationist and acts primarily as a skeptical reviewer. A critical review of the article is available on the Panda's Thumb website.

Meyer's alleges that those who oppose "Darwinism" are persecuted by the scientific community: "The numbers of scientists who question Darwinism is a minority, but it is growing fast. This is happening in the face of fierce attempts to intimidate and suppress legitimate dissent. Young scientists are threatened with deprivation of tenure. Others have seen a consistent pattern of answering scientific arguments with ad hominem attacks. In particular, the series' attempt to stigmatize all critics--including scientists--as religious 'creationists' is an excellent example of viewpoint discrimination."

Political controversy

A "Teach the ControversyTeach the Controversy" strategy was announced by Meyer following a presentation to the Ohio State Board of Education in March 2002. The presentation included submission of an annotated bibliography of 44 peer-reviewed scientific articles that were said to raise significant challenges to key tenets of what was referred to as “Darwinian evolution”. In response to this claim the National Center for Science Education, an organisation that works in collaboration with National Academy of Sciences, the National Association of Biology Teachers, and the National Science Teachers Association that support the teaching of evolution in public schools, contacted the authors of the papers listed and twenty-six scientists, representing thirty-four of the papers, responded. None of the authors considered that their research provided evidence against evolution.

On March 11, 2002 during a panel discussion on evolution Meyer publicly told the Ohio Board of Education that the "Santorum Amendment" was part of the Education Bill, and therefore that the State of Ohio was required to teach alternative theories to evolution as part of its biology curriculum. A Brown University Professor of Biology, Kenneth R. Miller, showed that the Santorum Amendment is not in the body of the Education Bill itself. Meyer and others rebutted that the language, while not in the bill itself is in the Conference Report to the bill and pointed out what they believe are misrepresentations by Miller. Miller replied that Conference Reports do not carry the weight of law and that in implying that they do, Meyer factually mistated the nature and gravitas of the Santorum Amendment.

Articles by Stephen C. Meyer
April 6, 2006 Stephen Meyer Responds to Research on Irreducible Complexity
Stephen C. Meyer
January 29, 2006 Signs of Intelligence
An originator of ID makes a case for weighing the theory about how we got here on its scientific merits
Stephen C. Meyer
December 10, 2005 Not by chance: From bacterial propulsion systems to human DNA, evidence of intelligent design is everywhere
Stephen C. Meyer
November 30, 2005 Intelligent Design: The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories
Stephen C. Meyer
November 13, 2005 The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design:
The Methodological Equivalence of Naturalistic and Non-Naturalistic Origins Theories1
Stephen C. Meyer
August 26, 2005 How Should Schools Handle Evolution? Debate it
John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer
May 23, 2005 The Letter Nature Wouldn't Print
Staff & Stephen C. Meyer
April 19, 2005 Darwin Himself Argued for Critical Evaluation
John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer
March 31, 2005 Stephen Meyer Responds to Michael Shermer’s Falsehoods in the Los Angeles Times
Stephen C. Meyer
March 11, 2005 Teach The Controversy
Stephen C. Meyer and John Angus Campbell
January 29, 2005 Teach Scientific Controversy About Origins of Life
John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer
December 9, 2004 Controversy over life's origins
Students should learn to assess competing theories
Stephen C. Meyer, John Angus Campbell
September 1, 2004 Genetic Analysis of Coordinate Flagellar and Type III Regulatory Circuits in Pathogenic Bacteria
Second International Conference on Design & Nature, Rhodes Greece.
Scott A. Minnich & Stephen C. Meyer
July 15, 2004 Unlocking the Mystery of Life--
Documentary reveals growing number of scientific challenges to Darwinian evolution
Stephen C. Meyer and W. Peter Allen
July 2, 2004 Where Does the Evidence Lead?
Modular classroom version of Unlocking the Mystery of Life
W. Peter Allen and Stephen C. Meyer
March 16, 2004 Teaching about Scientific Dissent from Neo-Darwinism
Stephen C. Meyer
February 19, 2004 Verdict on the Bacterial Flagellum Premature:
A Response to Begley's "Evolution Critics Come Under Fire.." in the Wall Street Journal
Stephen C. Meyer
February 15, 2004 Incorporate Controversy into the Curriculum
By STEPHEN C. MEYER and JOHN ANGUS CAMPBELL
December 1, 2003 The Cambrian Explosion:
Biology's Big Bang
Stephen C. Meyer, Marcus Ross, Paul Nelson & Paul Chien
December 1, 2003 DNA and the Origin of Life:
Information, Specification, and Explanation
Stephen C. Meyer
September 19, 2003 Textbook Debate
It's All About the Evidence
Stephen C. Meyer
January 1, 2003 Darwinism, Design, and Public Education
John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer
December 1, 2002 Evidence for Design in Physics and Biology:
From the Origin of the Universe to the Origin of Life
Stephen C. Meyer
December 1, 2002 The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design:
The Methodological Equivalence of Naturalistic and Non-Naturalistic Origins Theories1
Stephen C. Meyer
November 11, 2002 Intelligent Design vs. Darwinism: Theories in Collision
Stephen C. Meyer
June 10, 2002 Darwin Would Love This Debate
Bruce Chapman and Stephen C. Meyer
March 30, 2002 Teach the Controversy
Stephen C. Meyer
December 12, 2001 Meyer Exchange at Whitworth College
Stephen C. Meyer
December 1, 2001 Word Games:
DNA, Design, and Intelligence
Stephen C. Meyer
September 28, 2001 Darwin’s Public Defenders
Stephen C. Meyer
May 16, 2001 The Meanings of Evolution
Stephen C. Meyer and Michael Newton Keas
March 31, 2001 Darwin in the Dock
Stephen C. Meyer
December 28, 2000 A plan for recovery of the iffy economy
Bruce Chapman and Stephen C. Meyer
December 1, 2000 Qualified Agreement:
Modern Science & the Return of the "God Hypothesis"
Stephen C. Meyer
October 21, 2000 What's the difference?
If George W. Bush would spell it out, he has a fighting chance
Stephen C. Meyer
October 16, 2000 "E" is for evolution; "F" is for Fordham
Stephen C. Meyer
April 1, 2000 DNA and Other Designs
Stephen C. Meyer
February 9, 2000 Teaching the Origins Controversy:
Science, Or Religion, Or Speech?
David K. DeWolf, Stephen C. Meyer, Mark E. DeForrest
January 1, 2000 The Demarcation of Science and Religion
Stephen C. Meyer
October 1, 1999 Teaching the Controversy:
Darwinism, Design and the Public School Science Curriculum
David K. DeWolf, Stephen C. Meyer, Mark E. DeForrest
January 1, 1999 The Return of the God Hypothesis
Stephen C. Meyer
January 1, 1999 Teleological Evolution:
The Difference it Doesn’t Make
Stephen C. Meyer
October 1, 1998 DNA by Design:
An Inference to the Best Explanation for the Origin of Biological Information
Stephen C. Meyer
September 1, 1998 Fruitful Interchange or Polite Chitchat?
The Dialogue Between Science and Theology
William A. Dembski and Stephen C. Meyer
August 21, 1998 Testimony to the United States Commission on Civil Rights:
Concerning the Teaching Of Biological Origins
Stephen C. Meyer
August 21, 1998 US Commission on Civil Rights Hearing:
On Curriculum Controversies in Biology (unedited transcript)
Stephen C. Meyer, Eugenie Scott, Richard Sybrandy
March 29, 1998 Let Schools Provide Full Disclosure
Stephen C. Meyer
January 1, 1998 The Scientifically Correct Book Review of Phillip Johnson's Darwin on Trial
Stephen C. Meyer
September 1, 1997 The Message in the Microcosm:
DNA and the Death of Materialism
Stephen C. Meyer
June 6, 1997 A Pro-Life Case for the Daschle Bill
Stephen C. Meyer And David K. DeWolf
July 4, 1996 "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" In Biology Instruction
Stephen C. Meyer
May 1, 1996 Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules
A Book Review
Stephen C. Meyer and Paul A. Nelson
April 1, 1996 The Origin of Life and the Death of Materialism
Stephen C. Meyer
November 1, 1995 By Design:
A Whitworth professor takes a controversial stand to show that life was no accident
Stephen C. Meyer
April 21, 1995 GOP Can Achieve Health Care Reform by Keeping it Simple
Stephen C. Meyer
April 17, 1995 Why Clinton Crime Bill Doesn't Pay
Stephen C. Meyer
March 20, 1995 Fetal Position
Stephen C. Meyer, David K. Dewolf
November 14, 1994 Befuddled by Life's Origin
Stephen C. Meyer
October 18, 1994 Trouble in Political Paradise
Stephen C. Meyer, David K. DeWolf
February 21, 1994 Open Debate on Life’s Origins
Stephen C. Meyer
January 17, 1994 The Harmony of Natural Law
Stephen C. Meyer
January 1, 1994 The Methodological Equivalence of Design & Descent:
Can There Be a Scientific "Theory of Creation"?
Stephen C. Meyer
January 1, 1994 Laws, Causes and Facts:
A Response to Professor Ruse
Stephen C. Meyer
January 1, 1994 The Use and Abuse of Philosophy of Science:
Response to J.P. Moreland
Stephen C. Meyer
December 6, 1993 Danger: Indoctrination
A Scopes Trial for the '90s
Stephen C. Meyer
November 24, 1993 Scientific Correctness in San Francisco
Stephen C. Meyer
May 1, 1993 A Note to Teachers
Stephen C. Meyer and Mark Hartwig
September 22, 1989 Bush, Mulroney Should Embrace Thatcher
Stephen C. Meyer
December 27, 1987 Human Rights:
Blessed by God or Begrudged by Government?
Charles B. Thaxton, Stephen C. Meyer
May 29, 1986 Owen Gingerich
Stephen C. Meyer
March 1, 1986 Scientific Tenets of Faith
Stephen C. Meyer
March 1, 1986 We Are Not Alone
Stephen C. Meyer
June 1, 1985 Fully Formed:
The Discoveries of Fetology
Stephen C. Meyer
May 10, 1985 Go ahead, teach Darwinism, but tell both sides of the story
John Angus Campbell, Stephen C. Meyer
May 1, 1985 Christianity Challenges the University
Stephen C. Meyer

Site this page:

Timothy Ministries Dictionary of Theology. http://timothyministries.org 2005-2010.
"Stephen C. Meyer"  < http://timothyministries.org/theologicaldictionary/references.aspx?theword=stephen c. meyer >   Retrieved: Sep 6 2010 12:57PM
#twurch

 

related to your query 
fine-tuned universego »
creationgo »
Owen Gingerichgo »
George Gildergo »
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School Districtgo »
123
Translate a word/phrase

Translate stephen c. meyer to:
Other Items
Torrey's stephen c. meyer
Nave's stephen c. meyer
Easton's stephen c. meyer
Eurekster stephen c. meyer
Add td Search
to your Site.


 


Short Description
Timothy Ministries :: Dictionary of Theology
Some of the information in this database has been extracted in whole or in part with and without modifications from http://en.wikipedia.org in accordance with their copyleft policy, also known as "Share-alike".

Some of these terms may have been extracted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ » stephen c. meyer under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts.

A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
Readers, a word of caution about Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia articles are edited by volunteers. The only necessary qualifications to become a Wikipedia editor are:
  • willingness to contribute and
  • Internet access
and therefore, some Wikipedia articles may not be reliable since an editor could literally be anyone.

For further information about the reliability of Wikipedia articles, see the article: Reliability of Wikipedia

2005-2010 TimothyMinistries.org
Timothy Ministries is an IRS approved non-profit 501(c)(3) organization.
#twurch