| | Stephen C. Meyer is an American philosopher of science and theologian. Meyer, along with Bruce Chapman and George Gilder, is a founder of the Discovery Institute and its Center for Science and Culture, which advocates the controversial concept of intelligent design, and a leading proponent and lobbyist in the intelligent design movement. Meyer is a Vice President and Senior Fellow at the institute's Center for Science and Culture.BiographyStephen C. Meyer is director and Senior Fellow of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute, in Seattle. Meyer graduated with a degree in geology in 1980 from Whitworth College and worked in the oil industry. After attending a creationist conference he became increasingly interested in origins and rejected the evolutionary creationism in which he had previously believed. | Stephen C. Meyer | Meyer won a scholarship to Cambridge University in the United Kingdom to study the history and philosophy of science. Meyer earned his Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from Cambridge University in 1991. His dissertation was entitled Of clues and causes : a methodological interpretation of origin of life studies Meyer formerly worked as a geophysicist for the Atlantic Richfield Company and is now a Professor of the Conceptual Foundations of Science at Palm Beach Atlantic University, a Christian University, where he teaches a course on Christian apologetics in its School of Ministry. He was previously on the faculty of Whitworth College (which has links to the Presbyterian Church (USA) in Spokane, Washington for twelve years.Meyer earned his Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from Cambridge University for a dissertation on the history of origin of life biology and the methodology of the historical sciences. Previously he worked as a geophysicist with the Atlantic Richfield Company after earning his undergraduate degrees in Physics and Geology. Dr. Meyer has recently co-written or edited two books: Darwinism, Design, and Public Education with Michigan State University Press and Science and Evidence of Design in the Universe (Ignatius 2000). He has also authored numerous technical articles as well as editorials in magazines and newspapers such as The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, The Houston Chronicle, The Chicago Tribune, First Things and National Review.In 1990, Meyer, Bruce Chapman and George Gilder, formed the Discovery Institute as a non-profit educational foundation and think tank based upon the Christian apologetics of C. S. Lewis and opposed to materialism. It was founded as a branch of the Hudson Institute, an Indianapolis-based, conservative think tank and named for the HMS Discovery, which explored Puget Sound in 1792.In 1993, Chapman secured seed money in the form of a grant from Howard Ahmanson, Jr. and $450,000 from the MacLellan Foundation which underwrote the earliest nucleus of intelligent design authors who titled themselves "The Wedge". Meyer had previously tutored Ahmanson's son in science and Meyer recalls being asked by Ahmanson "What could you do if you had some financial backing?" It is from these beginnings that the intelligent design movement grew.Meyer has recently co-written or edited two books: Darwinism, Design, and Public Education with Michigan State University Press and Science and Evidence of Design in the Universe (Ignatius 2000). He has published over 70 articles and papers.Meyer has been described as "the person who brought ID (intelligent design) to DI (Discovery Institute)" by historian Edward Larson, who was a fellow at the Discovery Institute prior to it becoming the center of the intelligent design movement.Peer review controversyOn 4 August 2004, an article by Meyer appeared in the peer-reviewed scientific journal, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. On 7 September, the publisher of the journal, the Council of the Biological Society of Washington, released a statement repudiating the article as not meeting its scientific standards and not peer reviewed. The same statement vowed that proper review procedures would be followed in the future and endorsed a resolution published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which observes that there is no credible scientific evidence supporting ID. The journal's reasons for disavowing the article were denied by Richard Sternberg, the managing editor at the time the article was submitted and who subsequently left after its publication. Critics of Meyer's paper believe that Sternberg himself was biased in the matter, since he is a member of the editorial board of the Baraminology Study Group, an organization with a creationist agenda. The Baraminology Study Group's official position is that Sternberg is not a creationist and acts primarily as a skeptical reviewer. A critical review of the article is available on the Panda's Thumb website. Meyer's alleges that those who oppose "Darwinism" are persecuted by the scientific community: "The numbers of scientists who question Darwinism is a minority, but it is growing fast. This is happening in the face of fierce attempts to intimidate and suppress legitimate dissent. Young scientists are threatened with deprivation of tenure. Others have seen a consistent pattern of answering scientific arguments with ad hominem attacks. In particular, the series' attempt to stigmatize all critics--including scientists--as religious 'creationists' is an excellent example of viewpoint discrimination."Political controversyA "Teach the ControversyTeach the Controversy" strategy was announced by Meyer following a presentation to the Ohio State Board of Education in March 2002. The presentation included submission of an annotated bibliography of 44 peer-reviewed scientific articles that were said to raise significant challenges to key tenets of what was referred to as “Darwinian evolution”. In response to this claim the National Center for Science Education, an organisation that works in collaboration with National Academy of Sciences, the National Association of Biology Teachers, and the National Science Teachers Association that support the teaching of evolution in public schools, contacted the authors of the papers listed and twenty-six scientists, representing thirty-four of the papers, responded. None of the authors considered that their research provided evidence against evolution.On March 11, 2002 during a panel discussion on evolution Meyer publicly told the Ohio Board of Education that the "Santorum Amendment" was part of the Education Bill, and therefore that the State of Ohio was required to teach alternative theories to evolution as part of its biology curriculum. A Brown University Professor of Biology, Kenneth R. Miller, showed that the Santorum Amendment is not in the body of the Education Bill itself. Meyer and others rebutted that the language, while not in the bill itself is in the Conference Report to the bill and pointed out what they believe are misrepresentations by Miller. Miller replied that Conference Reports do not carry the weight of law and that in implying that they do, Meyer factually mistated the nature and gravitas of the Santorum Amendment. |
| Articles by Stephen C. Meyer | | April 6, 2006 | Stephen Meyer Responds to Research on Irreducible Complexity
| Stephen C. Meyer | | January 29, 2006 | Signs of Intelligence An originator of ID makes a case for weighing the theory about how we got here on its scientific merits | Stephen C. Meyer | | December 10, 2005 | Not by chance: From bacterial propulsion systems to human DNA, evidence of intelligent design is everywhere
| Stephen C. Meyer | | November 30, 2005 | Intelligent Design: The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories
| Stephen C. Meyer | | November 13, 2005 | The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design: The Methodological Equivalence of Naturalistic and Non-Naturalistic Origins Theories1 | Stephen C. Meyer | | August 26, 2005 | How Should Schools Handle Evolution? Debate it
| John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer | | May 23, 2005 | The Letter Nature Wouldn't Print
| Staff & Stephen C. Meyer | | April 19, 2005 | Darwin Himself Argued for Critical Evaluation
| John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer | | March 31, 2005 | Stephen Meyer Responds to Michael Shermer’s Falsehoods in the Los Angeles Times
| Stephen C. Meyer | | March 11, 2005 | Teach The Controversy
| Stephen C. Meyer and John Angus Campbell | | January 29, 2005 | Teach Scientific Controversy About Origins of Life
| John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer | | December 9, 2004 | Controversy over life's origins Students should learn to assess competing theories | Stephen C. Meyer, John Angus Campbell | | September 1, 2004 | Genetic Analysis of Coordinate Flagellar and Type III Regulatory Circuits in Pathogenic Bacteria Second International Conference on Design & Nature, Rhodes Greece. | Scott A. Minnich & Stephen C. Meyer | | July 15, 2004 | Unlocking the Mystery of Life-- Documentary reveals growing number of scientific challenges to Darwinian evolution | Stephen C. Meyer and W. Peter Allen | | July 2, 2004 | Where Does the Evidence Lead? Modular classroom version of Unlocking the Mystery of Life | W. Peter Allen and Stephen C. Meyer | | March 16, 2004 | Teaching about Scientific Dissent from Neo-Darwinism
| Stephen C. Meyer | | February 19, 2004 | Verdict on the Bacterial Flagellum Premature: A Response to Begley's "Evolution Critics Come Under Fire.." in the Wall Street Journal | Stephen C. Meyer | | February 15, 2004 | Incorporate Controversy into the Curriculum
| By STEPHEN C. MEYER and JOHN ANGUS CAMPBELL | | December 1, 2003 | The Cambrian Explosion: Biology's Big Bang | Stephen C. Meyer, Marcus Ross, Paul Nelson & Paul Chien | | December 1, 2003 | DNA and the Origin of Life: Information, Specification, and Explanation | Stephen C. Meyer | | September 19, 2003 | Textbook Debate It's All About the Evidence | Stephen C. Meyer | | January 1, 2003 | Darwinism, Design, and Public Education
| John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer | | December 1, 2002 | Evidence for Design in Physics and Biology: From the Origin of the Universe to the Origin of Life | Stephen C. Meyer | | December 1, 2002 | The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design: The Methodological Equivalence of Naturalistic and Non-Naturalistic Origins Theories1 | Stephen C. Meyer | | November 11, 2002 | Intelligent Design vs. Darwinism: Theories in Collision
| Stephen C. Meyer | | June 10, 2002 | Darwin Would Love This Debate
| Bruce Chapman and Stephen C. Meyer | | March 30, 2002 | Teach the Controversy
| Stephen C. Meyer | | December 12, 2001 | Meyer Exchange at Whitworth College
| Stephen C. Meyer | | December 1, 2001 | Word Games: DNA, Design, and Intelligence | Stephen C. Meyer | | September 28, 2001 | Darwin’s Public Defenders
| Stephen C. Meyer | | May 16, 2001 | The Meanings of Evolution
| Stephen C. Meyer and Michael Newton Keas | | March 31, 2001 | Darwin in the Dock
| Stephen C. Meyer | | December 28, 2000 | A plan for recovery of the iffy economy
| Bruce Chapman and Stephen C. Meyer | | December 1, 2000 | Qualified Agreement: Modern Science & the Return of the "God Hypothesis" | Stephen C. Meyer | | October 21, 2000 | What's the difference? If George W. Bush would spell it out, he has a fighting chance | Stephen C. Meyer | | October 16, 2000 | "E" is for evolution; "F" is for Fordham
| Stephen C. Meyer | | April 1, 2000 | DNA and Other Designs
| Stephen C. Meyer | | February 9, 2000 | Teaching the Origins Controversy: Science, Or Religion, Or Speech? | David K. DeWolf, Stephen C. Meyer, Mark E. DeForrest | | January 1, 2000 | The Demarcation of Science and Religion
| Stephen C. Meyer | | October 1, 1999 | Teaching the Controversy: Darwinism, Design and the Public School Science Curriculum | David K. DeWolf, Stephen C. Meyer, Mark E. DeForrest | | January 1, 1999 | The Return of the God Hypothesis
| Stephen C. Meyer | | January 1, 1999 | Teleological Evolution: The Difference it Doesn’t Make | Stephen C. Meyer | | October 1, 1998 | DNA by Design: An Inference to the Best Explanation for the Origin of Biological Information | Stephen C. Meyer | | September 1, 1998 | Fruitful Interchange or Polite Chitchat? The Dialogue Between Science and Theology | William A. Dembski and Stephen C. Meyer | | August 21, 1998 | Testimony to the United States Commission on Civil Rights: Concerning the Teaching Of Biological Origins | Stephen C. Meyer | | August 21, 1998 | US Commission on Civil Rights Hearing: On Curriculum Controversies in Biology (unedited transcript) | Stephen C. Meyer, Eugenie Scott, Richard Sybrandy | | March 29, 1998 | Let Schools Provide Full Disclosure
| Stephen C. Meyer | | January 1, 1998 | The Scientifically Correct Book Review of Phillip Johnson's Darwin on Trial
| Stephen C. Meyer | | September 1, 1997 | The Message in the Microcosm: DNA and the Death of Materialism | Stephen C. Meyer | | June 6, 1997 | A Pro-Life Case for the Daschle Bill
| Stephen C. Meyer And David K. DeWolf | | July 4, 1996 | "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" In Biology Instruction
| Stephen C. Meyer | | May 1, 1996 | Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules A Book Review | Stephen C. Meyer and Paul A. Nelson | | April 1, 1996 | The Origin of Life and the Death of Materialism
| Stephen C. Meyer | | November 1, 1995 | By Design: A Whitworth professor takes a controversial stand to show that life was no accident | Stephen C. Meyer | | April 21, 1995 | GOP Can Achieve Health Care Reform by Keeping it Simple
| Stephen C. Meyer | | April 17, 1995 | Why Clinton Crime Bill Doesn't Pay
| Stephen C. Meyer | | March 20, 1995 | Fetal Position
| Stephen C. Meyer, David K. Dewolf | | November 14, 1994 | Befuddled by Life's Origin
| Stephen C. Meyer | | October 18, 1994 | Trouble in Political Paradise
| Stephen C. Meyer, David K. DeWolf | | February 21, 1994 | Open Debate on Life’s Origins
| Stephen C. Meyer | | January 17, 1994 | The Harmony of Natural Law
| Stephen C. Meyer | | January 1, 1994 | The Methodological Equivalence of Design & Descent: Can There Be a Scientific "Theory of Creation"? | Stephen C. Meyer | | January 1, 1994 | Laws, Causes and Facts: A Response to Professor Ruse | Stephen C. Meyer | | January 1, 1994 | The Use and Abuse of Philosophy of Science: Response to J.P. Moreland | Stephen C. Meyer | | December 6, 1993 | Danger: Indoctrination A Scopes Trial for the '90s | Stephen C. Meyer | | November 24, 1993 | Scientific Correctness in San Francisco
| Stephen C. Meyer | | May 1, 1993 | A Note to Teachers
| Stephen C. Meyer and Mark Hartwig | | September 22, 1989 | Bush, Mulroney Should Embrace Thatcher
| Stephen C. Meyer | | December 27, 1987 | Human Rights: Blessed by God or Begrudged by Government? | Charles B. Thaxton, Stephen C. Meyer | | May 29, 1986 | Owen Gingerich
| Stephen C. Meyer | | March 1, 1986 | Scientific Tenets of Faith
| Stephen C. Meyer | | March 1, 1986 | We Are Not Alone
| Stephen C. Meyer | | June 1, 1985 | Fully Formed: The Discoveries of Fetology | Stephen C. Meyer | | May 10, 1985 | Go ahead, teach Darwinism, but tell both sides of the story
| John Angus Campbell, Stephen C. Meyer | | May 1, 1985 | Christianity Challenges the University
| Stephen C. Meyer | |